Do your managers solicit input from other managers and employees when they provide developmental feedback to their reporting staff? If they don’t they are missing one of the best opportunities they have to provide legitimate, effective feedback with examples to employees.
Use These Sample Questions to Administer Your 360 Reviews
But, organizations that use an informal 360 review process in which managers ask for input about employee performance from an employee’s coworkers may find themselves awash in a sea of data. A free-form question that asks for feedback about the coworkers’ view of the employee’s performance, both good and bad, elicits an outpouring of unorganized data and opinions.
A Structured Format Is Recommended for 360 Reviews
Without a structured format with questions for 360 reviews, free-form answers from other employees may provide a lot of data, but not data that will help the employee grow and prosper. The manager will have a challenging task to provide useful, actionable feedback to employees.
The response to the request for 360 feedback, in an organization that has a culture of trust, can be overwhelming. In environments of good will, employees want to let their managers know when a coworker has served them well. They'd also like to see improvements in the areas in which co-workers have a negative impact on their performance.
Managers receive so many pages of feedback in an unstructured 360 review format that they can feel overwhelmed when buried in all of the data. Managers can feel that the time invested in organizing feedback from the 360 reviews outweighs the benefit they and the employees receive from the process. This is not good.
360 reviews are crucial to an employee’s ability to understand and act on feedback that will help him contribute more effectively.
While the manager's feedback is important, it is insufficient since the manager doesn't work with the employee every day. The manager may only see the employee every few days and only receive progress reports at the weekly one on one meeting.
Ken Blanchard once said that a river that has no banks is a pond. His words echo forcefully in the realm of the 360 review. In an earlier article about how to make the 360 review effective, important ideas were shared which you will also want to consider as you develop your 360 review process.
Here are suggested questions that will help you provide your 360 reviews with banks.
Determining Questions
You can, of course, develop one set of questions that you use in each 360 review request that you send out. This is a step in the right direction.
Just as individual new employee onboarding processes are developed that encompass the new employee's job, it is recommended that you develop a sample group of questions from which you pick and choose when you ask for responses for an employee’s 360-degree review.
In this approach, you can decide on which aspects of the employee’s performance to concentrate your attention. You can work on developing different strengths each year. A variety of approaches fit each employee’s individual needs.
In deciding which characteristics, traits, and activities to develop questions about for 360 reviews, data provided by Indeed.com was used. They tracked the attributes employers most frequently sought in potential employees from their employment ads for a period of time. These attributes will still be considered essential to an employee’s performance.
Review Questions
Use these questions when you request feedback in a 360-degree review.
Instructions:Please answer the following questions about the job performance of (employee name). Emphasize your individual experience working directly with him and his team. We’d like to learn about what he does well in each of these areas.
We’d also like you to suggest areas for improvement where possible. Provide examples whenever you can as these best illuminate the employee's actions in context.
Your answers will be combined with the rest of the feedback we receive and we will provide the information to the employee. Because of individual incidents that may be identifiable by the employee, we don’t guarantee the confidentiality of your feedback. We need to use examples so the employee can obtain a realistic and actionable picture of his performance.
Leadership
Interpersonal Skills
Problem Solving
Motivation
Efficiency
These five examples of the types of questions that will improve the effectiveness of your 360 reviews are provided to assist you in your 360 review process. They help the employees responding know what you want to know. They organize the feedback in a way that promotes your ease of organization for sharing the information with the employee.
Providing feedback to the employee is more effective when you frame questions that guide the feedback that you receive. You can use these sample questions to prepare your own 360 reviews or write your own based on these examples.
The Pitch: The pervy old uncle of rock autobiographies, 2000’s The Dirt charts the exploits of glam-metal antiheroes Mötley Crüe. Heroin overdoses, a Hoover Dam’s worth of alcohol, vehicular manslaughter, and lots and lots of disgusting sex are all common threads in a series of first-person interviews with writer Neil Strauss. After getting stuck in development hell for more than a decade, the film adaptation has finally come to fruition as a Netflix original.
Generation Swine: At the fingertips of screenwriters Amanda Adelson and Jeff Kapinos (and probably the band themselves, as they co-produced), the film hits upon most of the big-picture, better-known touchstones of Crüe lore, good and bad. Bassist Nikki Sixx (Douglas Booth) ODs on heroin and is declared dead for a few minutes, the inspiration behind the band’s hit “Kickstart My Heart”; drummer Tommy Lee (Machine Gun Kelly) wigs out on his customized drum rollercoaster; Mick Mars (Iwan Rheon) battles alcoholism and anklyosing spondylitis; and singer Vince Neil (Daniel Webber) accidentally kills Hanoi Rocks drummer Nicholas “Razzle” Dingley while driving drunk.
And while the film doesn’t exactly depict Mötley Crüe as superheroes, it does notably leave out some of the key lower points in their narrative — namely their degradation of women. While the script never shies away from the graphic sexuality of the time, it never fully engages with how abusive and horrible the band spent their careers being to the opposite sex. The notorious phone incident with a groupie is nowhere to be found, and no, the story doesn’t even begin to tangle with Sixx’s admission that he and Lee “pretty much” raped another groupie by tricking her into having intercourse with them both in a dark closet. Lee’s marriage to Pamela Anderson and the infamous sex tape and domestic abuse scandal that followed are also curiously absent.
This isn’t to say that there’s much necessity for a rock biopic rife with scenes of sexual abuse and assault. However, The Dirt never bothers to ask any hard questions when it comes to the actual repentance (if any) of its rock star protagonists. The conversation around that kind of behavior is a lot different now than it was even two years ago, let alone a few decades back. But rather than taking a modern vantage as an opportunity for evolution or at least subversion, the script flat-out ignores any aspects of the Crüe’s life that might be harder for the public to accept.
Most of all, the film never asks its characters — and thus their real-life counterparts — to fully examine their life decisions, save for a heartbreaking hospital scene with Neil and his daughter, who died of cancer at four. The surface-level filmmaking does the biggest disservice of all to guitarist Mick Mars, whose only defining traits are his two illnesses. He never gets much to do, aside from going to the doctor and getting loaded in order to cope with his deteriorating health.
(Ranking: Every Motley Crüe Album from Worst to Best)
Film Review Questions Pdf
Saints Of Los Angeles: To be fair, Mötley Crüe and Strauss’ book never ventured into fully self-aware remorse in the first place. But across 431 pages, the hedonism becomes so effectively exhausting that you can’t help but view it as a cautionary tale. Reading it is like soldiering through the Blood Meridian of rock bios, the ugly-yet-fascinating cycle of sex and violence eventually just curdling into fatigue. And that was the (perhaps unintentional) message: Don’t be like these guys. Or, at the very least, that their lifestyle isn’t worth the toll taken on one’s health, mind, and soul.
The movie, on the other hand, just gives you the band’s greatest hits when it comes to past misdeeds; enough to check its based-on-a-true-story boxes, but nowhere near enough to delve into any kind of meaningful morality — accidental or otherwise. At the end of the day, this is the Mötley Crüe show, and they really want you to think they’re the coolest, that any darkness and mistreatment can be forgiven in light of how awesome and wild the ride on the drum rollercoaster has been.
Film Review With Questions Pdf
(Read: Mötley Crüe unveil two more new songs from the soundtrack to The Dirt: Stream)
Theatre of Pain: The film’s defanging also lies in the direction. On paper, Jeff Tremaine seems like the perfect guy to helm a movie about a bunch of men behaving badly, as he already has decades of experience capturing the real-life grime of Jackass, which he co-created. Despite that franchise’s general love of silliness, its shows and films have always felt nasty and authentic due to the raw approach: the handheld cameras, the refusal to shy away from unwieldy closeups and bodily fluids.
Robot structural analysis review. Steel structures are beyond the aim of this course, but are part of a parallel course. Design and analysis of beams, frames, portals and basic structures, obtaining its graphics shear and bending moment and the respective reactions at the supports. Getting reactions and graphs of forces and moments. Design and analysis of basic reinforced concrete structures. Design and analysis of two directions monolithic slabs.
A similarly documentary-minded approach could have worked for The Dirt, but instead the camera often remains static, rendering what should be an iconic scene involving Ozzy Osbourne (Tony Cavalero) completely flat. The graphic nature of the event is in place — there are ants, there’s a popsicle, and we do in fact see him snorting said ants off said popsicle — but it’s captured with such low energy that Steve-O funneling a beer into his own ass feels far more gritty and dangerous.
The production design doesn’t help, either. Like Bohemian Rhapsody before it, every outfit and decoration looks right off the costume rack or fresh out of the scene shop. Nothing feels lived-in. Even though the actors serviceably find what charisma they can in the shallow text, it’s hard to be believable under bad wigs, spandex, and a surface-level approach.
The Verdict: Any film adaptation of The Dirt should feel epic in its scumminess — to the point where you less relish the band’s lifestyle than feel like you need a shower after watching it. But its lack of energy, depth, and pure volume are, at the movie’s best, sanitized. Despite the long wait, The Dirt is nothing more than karaöke Crüe.
Where’s It Playing? Streaming on Netflix.
Trailer:
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |